Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

224 Kan. 12

577 P.2d 1172

Frost v. Hardin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1978

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1978-05-06

Relies on 1 Kan. App. 2d 464 - Frost v. Hardin

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-05-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Davidson v. Denning (1996), Hun v. Center Properties (1981)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions

120197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 The opinion of the court was delivered by

FROMME, J.:

¶2 This case comes to the court on a Petition for Review. The appeal from the Wyandotte District Court was heard in the Kansas Court of Appeals. Its formal opinion appears in Frost v. Hardin, 1 Kan. App. 2d 464, 571 P.2d 11 (1977). The issue there decided was whether claims by the children of a deceased father in a wrongful death action were barred because the claim of their widowed mother was barred by the statute of limitations. The Court of Appeals concluded the claims of the children were not barred and the judgment of the district court terminating the action should be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

¶3 The question decided was one of first impression in this state and concerned the rights of parties under the Kansas wrongful death act, K.S.A. 60-1901, et seq. At the time this court granted the Petition for Review we noted several inconsistencies in the Kansas wrongful death act and determined that the issue presented would justify further scrutiny by this court. We have fully considered the arguments and briefs of the parties in light of the provisions of the act. We approve and adopt the opinion of the Kansas Court of Appeals as written.

¶4*13 The judgment of the district court is reversed and remanded in accordance with the opinion of the Kansas Court of Appeals.

/224/kan/12 · .json · Public domain