Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 Kan. 173 - State v. McGee

State v. McGee’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
September 1994
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 1994

16 state decisions

80197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bly · State v. Faulkner · State v. Henson · State v. Arney · State v. Ames

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If, subsequent to compliance with an order issued pursuant to this section, and prior to or during trial, a party discovers additional material previously requested or ordered which is subject to discovery or inspection under this section, he shall promptly notify the other party or his attorney or the court of the existence of the additional material. If at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with this section or with an order issued pursuant to this section, the court may order such party to permit the discovery or inspection of materials not previously disclosed, grant a continuance, or prohibit the party from introducing in evidence the material not disclosed, or it may enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““On appellate review, the question is not whether the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but whether the evidence was sufficient to form the basis for a reasonable inference of guilt.” State v. McGee, 224 Kan. 173, 178 , 578 P.2d 269 (1978); State v. Ames, 222 Kan. 88, 95 , 563 P.2d 1034 (1977).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.