Reimer v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 district · 18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Although the general rule is that a party is bound by a judgment entered on stipulation or consent and may not appeal from a judgment in which he or she has acquiesced there is a well-recognized exception in those cases when the party attacks the judgment because of lack of consent or because the judgment deviates from the stipulation or when the party’s attorney had no authority to settle the case and did so without the agreement and consent of his client. (Anno. Consent Judgment — Appellate Review, 69 A.L.R.2d 755 : Edwards v. Cary, 20 Kan. 414 [1878]; Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311 , 72 L.Ed. 587 , 48 S.Ct. 311 [1928].)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 4 Kan. App. 2d 296 - Miotk v. Rudy

2. “[i]t has been recognized generally that a client is bound by the appearance, admissions, and actions of counsel acting on behalf of his client.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 62 Kan. App. 2d 10 - Granados v. Wilson