Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 Kan. 447 - State v. Coleman

State v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
8
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably State v. Trujillo (1979), Hurst v. State (1985)

26 state decisions

10019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 70 Cal. 2d 347 - People v. Curtis · State v. Freeman · State v. Gunzelman · State v. Stuart and Jones · State v. Gander

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... Here the aggravated battery occurred after the police officer had identified himself as such and while the officer was in the process of arresting the defendant for a crime committed in the officer's presence. We hold that a police officer who is working during his off-duty hours as a part-time store employee in detecting and apprehending shoplifters, who observes a customer secreting merchandise on his person, who identifies himself as a police officer to the customer outside the store, and who advises the customer that he is under arrest for shoplifting, is a law enforcement officer "engaged in the performance of his duty" within the provisions of K.S.A. 21 3415. [ Id. ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““any person wlio by virtue of office or public employment is vested by law with an duty to maintain public order or to make arrests for violation of the laws of the state of Kansas or ordinances of any municipality thereof or with a duty to maintain or assert custody or supervision over persons accused or convicted of crime, and includes court services officers, parole officers and directors, security personnel and keepers of correctional institutions, jails or other institutions for tire detention of persons accused or convicted of crime, while acting within the scope of their authority.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Aggravated battery against a law enforcement officer is an aggravated battery, as defined in section 21-3414, committed against a uniformed or properly identified state, county, or city law enforcement officer while such officer is engaged in the performance of his duty. Aggravated battery against a law enforcement officer is a class B felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.