State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1981
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ryan · State v. Spencer · Robbins v. Hannen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“DR 5-101 ... (B) A lawyer shall not accept employment in contemplated or pending litigation if he knows or it is obvious that he or a lawyer in his firm ought to be called as a witness, except that he may undertake the employment and he or a lawyer in his firm may testify:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Washington“(4) As to any matter, if refusal would work a substantial hardship on the client because of the distinctive value of the lawyer or his firm as counsel in the particular case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Washington“(2) If the testimony will relate solely to a matter of formality and there is no reason to believe that substantial evidence will be offered in opposition to the testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Washington
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.