Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 KAN 466 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1981
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ryan · State v. Spencer · Robbins v. Hannen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “DR 5-101 ... (B) A lawyer shall not accept employment in contemplated or pending litigation if he knows or it is obvious that he or a lawyer in his firm ought to be called as a witness, except that he may undertake the employment and he or a lawyer in his firm may testify:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(4) As to any matter, if refusal would work a substantial hardship on the client because of the distinctive value of the lawyer or his firm as counsel in the particular case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(2) If the testimony will relate solely to a matter of formality and there is no reason to believe that substantial evidence will be offered in opposition to the testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.