Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 Md. 17 - Spence v. State

Spence v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2017

10 state decisions

60196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anello v. State · Bell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The jury’s finding clearly reveals that it did not believe the defense presented and found that the appellant was not free from guilt. ‘One is guilty [of unauthorized, use] under section 349, if he participates in the continued use of the stolen car after the original taking, since this manifests the intent to deprive the owner of his possession.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.