Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 Md. 320 - Krieger v. Planning Commission

Krieger v. Planning Commission’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
4
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Bureau of Mines v. George's Creek Coal and Land Co. (1974), J.L. Matthews, Inc. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission (2002)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 36 state decisions

170196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · Durley v. Mayo · Ayres v. City Council of Los Angeles · Grant v. Mayor of Baltimore · Benner v. Tribbitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Other courts have reached the conclusion that planning requirements under which developers record plats and obtain approval of roads and strips bordering on roads are within the police power and not compensable."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If [the planning commission] could properly [adopt subdivision regulations], it was not arbitrary to enforce them by denying approval of a plan which did not conform. In the absence of constitutional objection the power of a municipal corporation to impose reasonable conditions upon the issuance of a permit can hardly be doubted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.