Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 Md. 42 - Iozzi v. State

Iozzi v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2014

20 state decisions

60196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McClain v. Commonwealth · Dean v. State · Roberts v. State · State v. Ragland · Turner v. Alton Banking & Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Moreover, it is generally held that geographical facts of a local nature may be judicially noticed by a trial court to establish venue. . . . This is particularly true as to the location of towns within a particular county where the court sits. We think the trial court could properly take judicial notice that the town of Arbutus is within the territorial limits of Baltimore County.” 242 Md. at 44.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.