Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 MICH 365 - Hull v. Hostettler

Hull v. Hostettler’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2018

8 state decisions

501923193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hodges v. Buell · Walker v. Casgrain · Crane v. Dwyer · Lozon v. McKay · Cutler v. Lovinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Equity dislikes forfeitures and not only will not aid in enforcing them, but will restrict their effect as far as possible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “does not absolutely prohibit the vendee from selling and assigning his interest in the property”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]f it did, it would be an unlawful restriction upon the power to alienate real estate”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.