Conrad v. Cummer-Diggins Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gall v. Detroit Journal Co. · Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co. · Carleton v. Foundry & Machine Products Co. · Zoltowski v. Ternes Coal & Lumber Co. · Van Simaeys v. George R. Cook Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the deceased was an independent contractor the company would have a right of control only as to the results of the work, a right ‘to have the results in accordance with the contract.’ Any other control would be evidence of a relation of employer and employee.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““there was some competent evidence to sustain the finding that at the time of the injury Conrad was an employee of the Cummer-Diggins Company.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.