Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

224 Mich. 615

Sackner v. Sackner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1923

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1923-10-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1942

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1923-10-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wiest, C. J.

¶1(concurrmg). I am in accord with the opinion affirming the decree, but think defendant *626should be held to abide the order of this court granting her expense money, and, therefore, the cost of procuring testimony from the stenographer, printing the record and briefs of her counsel, should be deducted from the amount of alimony allowed her.

Bird, J., concurred with Wiest, C. J.
/224/mich/615 · .json · Public domain