224 Mo. App. 1138 - Phillips v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1931
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We think a reading of the entire section discloses that it was intended, so far as personal property is concerned, other than crops to limit its application to such personal property which may be, or has been, upon the rented property. . . . It is quite evident, therefore, that it was intended that the personal property on the rented premises should be a form of security for the rent, and attachment exists must at least be identified by its past or present situs to destroy such security.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.