Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 Mont. 1 - Reiser v. Prunty

Reiser v. Prunty’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 1994
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cereck v. Albertson's Inc. · Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc. · First National Bank Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America · Collins v. Itoh · Matter of Shennum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Patients have a right to be free from physical restraint and isolation. Except for emergency situations in which it is likely that patients could harm themselves or others and in which less restrictive means of restraint are not feasible, patients may be physically restrained or placed in isolation only on a professional person's written order which explains the rationale for such action.... Whenever a patient is subject to restraint or isolation, adequate care shall be taken to monitor his physical and psychiatric condition and to provide for his physical needs and comfort.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “people who are `committed by the court for treatment for any period of time....'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.