224 N.C. App. 454 - Coderre v. Futrell’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 108 · 11 U.S.C. § 1107
Relies on Stanback v. Stanback · 157 N.C. App. 396 - Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc. · Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. Gibbs · Leary v. NC Forest Products, Inc. · 80 N.C. App. 482 - Long v. Fink
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Woodring v. Swieter , 180 N.C. App. 362 , 366, 637 S.E.2d 269 , 274 (2006).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. WLAE, LLC v. Edwards
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.