State v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) On the premises of any place intended primarily for the use, care, or supervision of minors, including, but not limited to, schools, children’s museums, child care centers, nurseries, and playgrounds. (2) Within 300 feet of any location intended primarily for the use, care, or supervision of minors when the place is located on premises that are not intended primarily for the use, care, or supervision of minors, including, but not limited to, places described in subdivision (1) of this subsection that are located in malls, shopping centers, or other property open to the general public. (3) At any place where minors gather for regularly scheduled educational, recreational, or social programs.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 40 F. Supp. 3d 657 - Does 1-5 v. Cooper · 244 N.C. App. 112 - State v. Fryou

2. “primarily for the use, care, or supervision of minors”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 242 N.C. App. 252 - State v. Armstrong · 244 N.C. App. 112 - State v. Fryou

3. “[A] statute is unconstitutionally vague if it either: (1) fails to give the person of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to know what is prohibited; or (2) fails to provide explicit standards for those who apply the law. A statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application violates the first essential of due process of law.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 244 N.C. App. 112 - State v. Fryou