224 N.J. Super. 280 - State v. Pemberthy’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2016
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Swain v. State of Alabama · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Bullock v. United States · State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our review of the record satisfies us that the interpretation and translation of many of the telephone conversations constituted a major issue at the trial, and that many disputes centered on the interpretation of the statements made in the interpreted telephone conversations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pemberthy v. Beyer“We conclude that the State's reason for exclusion was predicated on valid, articulated, trial-related reasons rather than on the basis of the potential juror's presumed group bias.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Pemberthy v. Beyer“under the circumstances here, and as long as peremptory challenges are permissible, there was no reversible error”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Pemberthy v. Beyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.