Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 P.3d 105 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 23 Ohio App. 3d 93 - State v. Losey · 137 Ohio App. 3d 206 - State v. Lovelace · Pears v. State · Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities · Neitzel v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] person is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.