Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 S.C. 400 - King v. MOORE

King v. MOORE’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2005

9 state decisions

50195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sample v. Bedenbaugh · Camp v. Petroleum Carrier Corp. · St. Clair v. St. Clair

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As residents of Florence County, Moore and Calcutt are clearly entitled to a change of venue if Snipe has not been made a party defendant by lawful service of the summons on him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.