Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 S.C. 41 - State v. Grantham

State v. Grantham’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
5
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 172 So. 2d 824 - Hedges v. State (1965), 40 Md. App. 382 - Gainer v. State (1978)

28 state decisions

1301953196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. State · People v. . Tomlins · State v. Hewitt · State v. Bradley · Hutcherson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person need not retreat or seek to escape, even though he can do so without increasing his danger, but may lawfully resist even to the extent of taking life if necessary, where, being without fault in bringing on the difficulty, he is assaulted while in his own dwelling house. ... However, the rule is predicated on the absence of aggression or fault on his part in bringing on the difficulty; the doctrine is for defensive, and not offensive, purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Where a house, premises, or place of business is jointly occupied, used, and possessed by two persons, as by partners, joint tenants, or tenants in common, each joint occupant, being equally entitled to possession, need not retreat when attacked while in the building or premises by the other joint occupant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in his home lawfully occupied by him and ... without fault in bringing on the difficulty was not bound to retreat in order to invoke the benefit of the doctrine of self-defense, but could stand his ground and repel the attack with as much force as was reasonably necessary”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.