224 So. 2d 276 - State v. Ramos

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1989

3 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

PER CURIAM.

¶1The record in the instant case is in substantially the same condition as the record in State v. Kahler, 224 So.2d 272 (filed May 28, 1969, Fla.). For the reason there announced this cause is similarly temporarily remanded to the trial judge for the entry of an order in accord with our directive in Kahler, supra.

¶2It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, THOMAS, (Retired) and CALDWELL, (Retired), JJ., concur.

¶3On Petition for Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

¶4Upon consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing and/or modification, it is ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.

DREW, THORNAL, THOMAS (Retired) and CALDWELL (Retired), JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., concurs specially with opinion. ERVIN, Chief Justice

¶5(concurring specially) :

¶6I agree to the denial of the State’s petition for rehearing and/or modification for the reasons set forth in my specially concurring opinion in the case of State v. Kahler, 224 So.2d 272, filed this date.