Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 SO2D 502 - Ryland v. Wenner

Ryland v. Wenner’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 1982
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1982

7 state decisions

50196919701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Succession of Eck · Succession of Nourse · 183 So. 2d 436 - Succession of Michie · Natural Gas & Oil Corp. v. Waggonner · Succession of Pickett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * and declared by testator above named, in our presence to be his last will and testament, and in the presence of the testator and each other we have hereunto subscribed our names on this -- day of-, 19 — .” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * Attestation provisions are sufficient which, in conjunction with the testament itself, reasonably indicate that the testament was executed in accordance with the statutory formalities.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Other decisions of the Louisiana courts reenforce our conclusion that the usefulness of the modern Louisiana statutory will should not be vitiated by any sacrosanct requirement of form as to the attestation declaration. The purpose of this declaration, after all, is merely to ‘evidence’ (LSA-R.S. 9:2442(3)) fulfillment of the essential statutory requirements of form prescribed by the preceding sections of the enactment (i. e., LSA-R.S. 9:2442(2) and (2).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.