Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 So. 2d 565 - Smith v. Simon

224 So. 2d 565 - Smith v. Simon’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2016

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

50196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. BOLOGNA · State v. Warren · Conithan v. Royal Insurance · Powelson v. National Airlines, Inc. · Capps v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) when the principal purpose of the contract directly furnishes aid and protection to an illegal enterprise, Smith v. Maryland Casualty Co., 252 Miss. 81 , 172 So.2d 574 (1965), involving fidelity bond covering employees who misappropriated illegal liquor; (2) when in order to enforce the contract a party must base his cause of action on his own illegal act, Capps v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co., 197 Miss. 118 , 19 So.2d 491 (1944), involving failure to deliver a telegram concerning a gambling contract; (3) where the contract itself is unlawful, Powelson v. National Airlines, 220 Miss. 595 , 71 So.2d 467 (1954), involving a contract to purchase stock in violation of a federal statute, and Morrissey v. Bologna, 240 Miss. 284 , 123 So.2d 537 (1960), involving an indebtedness for illegal liquor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There is no doubt that the courts have the duty and the power to declare void and unenforceable contracts made in violation of law or in contravention of the public policy of the state.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The function of the courts is to enforce contracts rather than enable parties to escape their obligation upon the pretext of public policy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.