Ebarb v. Boswell’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 977 So. 2d 880 - Samaha v. Rau · 512 So. 2d 389 - Caudle v. Betts · 483 So. 2d 908 - Simoneaux v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co., Inc. · 738 So. 2d 1205 - Eason v. Finch · Eason v. Finch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[R]egardless of how [the plaintiff] characterized his tort, the battery was the occurrence which gave rise to his claims against defendants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guste v. Lirette“allegation precluded a finding that coverage was not unambiguously excluded). Simply stated, a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“asking for [covered] damages. However, we have no duty to defend any”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guste v. Lirette
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.