Hickernell v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2007
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Texas Company v. W.H. Daugherty · Grubb v. McAfee · Benavides v. Hunt · Woodward v. Mitchell · Bettman v. Harness
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule is that, though fraud is neither alleged eo nomine nor set out by the pleader as a legal conclusion from the facts stated, yet, when the pleading sets up facts which, if true, amount to fraud, it is sufficient even without alleging a fraudulent intent. Mussiana v. Goldthwaite, 84 Tex. 126 , 7 Am. Rep. 281 ; Ames Portable Silo & Lumber Co. v. Gill, 190 S. W. 1130 , and authorities cited.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.