Cisneros v. Dingbaum’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 383rd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. · Brown v. United States · Gillespie v. Gillespie · Lenz v. Lenz · Lindsey v. Lindsey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the forces, powers, and influences that cannot be discerned by merely reading the record. Bell , 328 S.W.3d at 620 , ( citing Cisneros v. Dingbaum , 224 S.W.3d 245 , 257 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2005, no pet.).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martinez v. Gonzalez“If some evidence of a substantive and probative character exists to support the trial court's decision, no abuse of discretion has occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martinez v. Gonzalez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.