Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

224 S.W.3d 277

In Re Labruzzo

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · decided 2005-08-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2007

1 state decisions

Relies on Moody v. State · Hooks v. Fourth Court of Appeals

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-08-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

¶2 Relators, Donald V. Labruzzo, Carlos Camarillo and Plásticos Promex USA, Inc., ask this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 120th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will lie only to correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 883, 840 (Tex.1992)(orig. proceeding). Moreover, there must be no other adequate remedy at law. Id. In resolving issues presented in the context of an original mandamus proceeding, an appellate court may not deal with disputed matters of fact. Hooks v. Fourth Court of Appeals, 808 S.W.2d 56, 60 (Tex.1991). Based on the record before us, we are unable to conclude that Respondent clearly abused his discretion. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex. R.App.P. 52.8(a). Further, the emergency stay order entered on June 22, 2005 is lifted.

/224/sw3d/277 · .json · Public domain