Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 SW3D 300 - Fox v. Wardy

Fox v. Wardy’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 327th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343

Relies on Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control Board · Mayhew v. Town of Sunnyvale · Travis County v. Pelzel & Associates, Inc. · Britton v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice · Jewell v. City of Covington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) After assignment to a particular court, every case, both jury and non-jury, shall remain pending in such court until final disposition or transfer. (B) Any case may be transferred to another court by order of the judge of the court in which the case is pending with the consent of the judge of the court to which it is transferred, or by order of the local administrative judge. (C) Whenever any pending case is so related to another case pending in another court, the judge of the court in which the earliest filed case is pending may, upon motion (including the judge’s own motion) and notice, transfer the case to the court in which the earlier case is filed to facilitate the orderly and efficient disposition of the litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.