Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

224 S.W.3d 605

State v. Hamm

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-12-26

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2017

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-12-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Sharon Hamm appeals from her conviction for driving while intoxicated, a violation of Section 577.010, RSMo 2000. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find sufficient evidence to support the conviction and, therefore, affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

¶3 AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

/224/sw3d/605 · .json · Public domain