Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 TENN 9 - Lawrence v. Mullins

Lawrence v. Mullins’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
5
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1992

10 state decisions

601969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weeks v. United States · Amos v. United States · Haywood v. United States · Hughes v. State · State v. Bass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In some cases it is held that, though suppressed as evidence because unlawfully seized, contraband such as illicit stills, liquor, implements of crime, and stolen goods, will not be restored to the person from whom taken. Haywood v. United States, (C.C.A. 7), 268 F. 795 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.