Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 Va. 568 - Walker v. Mitchell

Walker v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2013 · most notably Coleman v. Thompson (1991), Goins v. Commonwealth (1996)

11 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

3001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fay v. Noia · Infelice v. United States · Slayton v. Parrigan · Taylor v. Commonwealth · Davis v. Peyton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Using affidavits where appropriate (Code § 8.01-660) or a plenary hearing when necessary (Code § 8.01-662), the parties can produce a complete record, one that will permit an intelligent disposition of the habeas petition both in the trial court and on appeal. Of course, if the record of the criminal trial is sufficient itself to show the merit or lack of merit of a habeas petition, the case may be determined upon that record alone. Code § 8.01-654(B)(4).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Borrowing from the federal experience, we establish this rule of decision for Virginia’s courts: where the filing of a petition for habeas corpus claiming ineffective assistance of counsel is so long delayed that the Commonwealth is prejudiced in its defense of the claim, the petition may be dismissed unless the petitioner shows that, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, he could not have known of the grounds for the petition before the prejudice occurred.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that in the interests of both the Commonwealth and the accused, the ends of justice dictate the adoption of a rule restricting to habeas corpus proceedings the litigation of claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.