Kobeckis v. Budzko’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2019
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 6 Cal. 2d 674 - Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co. · Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co. · Holt v. Mann · Nicketta v. National Tea Co. · Adams v. Scheib
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“etc., cited above are no real guide in the cooking of pork and pork products as a premise upon which to found a complaint for breach of implied warranty. As of this date, authoritative sources are uniform in saying that raising the pork or pork product to a temperature of 137° Fahrenheit kills trichinae and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“warranty implied ... on the sale of uncooked pork ... is that the pork ... is reasonably fit for human consumption only when properly cooked”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he usual use of meat as a food is when cooked, not when raw”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.