Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

225 A.D.2d 685

Silcott v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1996-03-18

Decided 1996-03-18

¶1*686We reject the plaintiffs contention that the verdict should be set aside as against the weight of the evidence, inasmuch as the verdict was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129).

¶2The plaintiffs remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Joy, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

/225/ad2d/685 · .json · Public domain