Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

225 Ala. 6

Daly v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 5, 1932

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1932-05-05

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1935

4 state decisions

Relies on Birmingham Electric Co. v. Harry · State v. Peoples · Vaughan v. State Ex Rel. Barker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-05-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Answering the foregoing inquiry, fees for state witnesses, including mileage, are fixed by general law. Section 3762, Code 1923.

¶2The local act (Local Acts 1907, p. 902) applicable alone to Walker county, fixes these fees at a different per diem and mileage than the above-noted general act. Witness’ fees constitute as much of the costs of the courts, and are as much a charge upon litigation, as the library tax considered in Birmingham Electric Co. v. Harry, 215 Ala. 458, 111 So. 41.

¶3The act in question runs counter to section 96 of our Constitution, and is therefore invalid as well as the act of 1909 (Gen. & Loc. Acts 1909, Sp. Sess., p. 415), amendatory thereof. See, also, Vaughan v. State ex rel. Barker, 212 Ala. 461, 103 So. 38.

All the Justices concur.
/225/ala/6 · .json · Public domain