Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 Ariz. 154 - McClung v. Bennett

McClung v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1973F (§ 8 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965)

Relies on State v. Smith · Mathieu v. Mahoney · Lubin v. Thomas · Mandraes v. Hungerford · Jenkins v. Hale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “McClung's belated prosecution of this appeal . . . would warrant dismissal on the grounds of laches, because his dilatory conduct left Sweeney with only one day to file his response brief, jeopardized election officials' timely compliance with statutory deadlines, and required the Court to decide this matter on an unnecessarily accelerated basis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.