In Re Hallmark’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2012
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1326 · 11 U.S.C. § 1329 · 11 U.S.C. § 330 · 11 U.S.C. § 503 · 11 U.S.C. § 507 · 28 U.S.C. § 1409 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-Appellant · Great Lakes Higher Education Corp. v. Pardee (In Re Pardee) · Max Recovery, Inc. v. Nguyen Hong Than (In Re Nguyen Hong Than) · In Re Parker · In Re Oliver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At any time after confirmation of the plan but before the completion of payments under such plan, the plan may be modified, upon request of the debtor, the trustee, or the holder of an allowed unsecured claim, to — (1) increase or reduce the amount of payments on claims of a particular class provided for by the plan...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Jafary
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.