Halbert v. Yousif’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

cited by 10 later decisions

September 2016

most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1103 · 11 U.S.C. § 1107 · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 327 · 11 U.S.C. § 329 · 11 U.S.C. § 330

Relies on Woods v. City Nat Bank & Trust Co of Chicago · United States v. Virginia · 116 S. Ct. 712 - Neben & Starrett, Inc. v. Chartwell Financial Corp. · 118 S. Ct. 335 - Gens v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Martin Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“The denial by the Bankruptcy Court of Halbert’s fee application in the Tanners’ bankruptcy case is affirmed, although certain findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the holding by the Bankruptcy Court was based are vacated and remanded to the Bankruptcy Court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Yousif v. Yousif · In Re: Sami Yousif, Debtor. Todd M. Halbert v. Sami Yousif Sana Yousif Florence Tanners, Incorporated,defendants-Appellees
“[t]he Bankruptcy Court correctly determined that, as a result of receiving transfers of value from Tanners within the ninety-day preference period, Halbert became ineligible to serve as its attorney, at least in the absence of curative measures which did not occur here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. In Re: Sami Yousif
“Violations of the disclosure and disinterestedness rules are independent of each other, although the remedies for each are similar.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. In Re: Sami Yousif

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.