Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

225 F. 45

Docket No. 2432.

Leibe v. Walker Bin Co.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1913.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1913-01-07

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Rufus E. Foster, Judge.</p> <p>Suit in equity by the Walker Bin Company against Magdaline Leibe and William Leibe, Jr., trading as the Wm. Leibe Refrigerator Manufactory. Decree for complainant (224 Fed. 516) and defendants appeal.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1916

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Walker Bin Co. v. Leibe

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1913-01-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Patents @=s>328—Validity and Infringement—Tilting Bin.

¶2The Walker patent, No. 014,279, for a tilting bin, designed chiefly for use in grocery stores, held valid and infringed.

¶3Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Rufus E. Foster, Judge.

¶4Suit in equity by the Walker Bin Company against Magdaline Leibe and William Leibe, Jr., trading as the Wm. Leibe Refrigerator Manu*46factory. Decree for complainant (224 Fed. 516) and defendants appeal.

¶5*45©=jFor other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes

¶6*46Affirmed.

¶7T. Hart Anderson, of New York City, for appellants.

¶8Ernest Howard Hunter, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

¶9Before PARDEE and SHEEBY, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.

¶10PER CURIAM.

¶11A majority of the judges being of the opinion that there is no error in the record, the decree is affirmed.

/225/f1d/45 · .json · Public domain