Nash v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
225 F.2d 42 · 1955
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 1956
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1010
Relies on Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference · Best v. United States · Powell v. Branman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In our view, plaintiff-appellant’s demand is in essence this: that he be selected for a higher rated post and paid a higher salary. Such a demand is primarily one for con-. sideration and decision by the agencies involved, and not by the courts. * * ■ * > Nothing in the governing statutes and regulations gave plaintiff a vested right to the appointment he seeks. No procedural error was committed. There was no misconstruction of governing law, and no arbitrary or capricious action.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.