Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 F.2d 902 - Nelson v. United States

Nelson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

225 F.2d 902 · 1955

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2023

10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

5019551960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 4161

Relies on Burns v. United States · Manning v. United States · Hollandsworth v. United States · Myers v. New York State Tax Commission · Hunter v. Facchine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Courts may not act arbitrarily in revoking probations, but all that is required is evidence and facts which reasonably satisfy the judge that the probationer’s conduct has not been as good as that required by the conditions of probation. (Citation of cases).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.