The Upjohn Company v. Mova Pharmaceutical Corp.,defendant-Appellee’s Empirical Analysis
225 F.3d 1306 · 2000
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 15 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. · Warner-Jenkinson Company Inc v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co · Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister Inc. · Molins PLC v. Textron, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Inequitable conduct requires that the patentee withheld material information from the patent examiner or submitted false material information with the intent to deceive or mislead the examiner into granting the patent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Both materiality and intent to deceive must be proven by clear and convincing evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review these grounds for their support of the jury's verdicts of inequitable conduct and unenforceability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.