Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 FSUPP2D 731 - Doe v. Linam

Doe v. Linam’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Gulbenkian v. Penn · KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp. · Tuchman v. DSC Communications Corp. · S.V. v. R.V.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiff was clearly aware he had been abused and that he was having psychological problems at the time before the statutes of limitations began to run on his various causes of action. His knowledge of these facts and circumstances could have reasonably led him to discover his allegedly concealed causes of action [against the [a]rchdiocese], if he had only made a simple inquiry into his rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.