Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 FSUPP3D 604 - Faas v. Cascos

Faas v. Cascos’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
May 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Neitzke v. Williams · Steffel v. Thompson · Dunn v. Blumstein · Anderson v. Celebrezze

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “could hardly serve their legitimate purposes if they were routinely subject to strict scrutiny ... [thus], [t]he United States Supreme Court recognized the need for a more flexible analytical framework in two landmark cases: Anderson and Burdick”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.