Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 Ga. 669 - Gee v. State

Gee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
6
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably State v. Estevez (1974), State v. Cameron (1973)

51 state decisions

2401969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Albrecht v. United States · Harris v. State · 102 Ga. App. 790 - Curtis v. State · Glustrom v. State · 94 Ga. App. 210 - Moore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘There are different elements present in the two crimes of selling and possessing the prohibited drugs. Proof of the illegal sale of the drugs would not prove the illegal possession of the drugs, since persons might legally possess the drugs who could not legally sell them. Proof of the illegal possession of the drugs would not prove the illegal sale of the drugs. Neither offense is a necessary element in, and constitutes an essential part of, the other offense. . . . ’” Gee v. State, 225 Ga. 669 , 171 S.E. 2d 291 (1969).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'Where there are two sections in a statute providing a punishment or penalty for the same act or offense, one providing a greater and the other a lesser, the section prescribing the greater is abrogated by the one prescribing the lesser.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.