Grider v. Scharf’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1995
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boor v. Lowrey · Needham v. Wright · Kelley v. Bell · Eckert v. Binkley · Yazel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A plea in abatement must not only point' out plaintiff’s error, but must show him how it may be ' corrected, and furnish him with materials for ' avoiding the same mistake again, or, in technical language, it must give the plaintiff a better writ. Citing Needham v. Wright (1894), 140 Ind. 190 , at page 194; 39 N. E. 510 ; 41 Am. Jur. p. 377 , §127; 49 C. J. 237; Watson’s Works Practice, Vol. 1, §558.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.