Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 Ind. 387 - App v. Class

App v. Class’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2012

4 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

8019471950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wolverton v. Wolverton · Ex parte Walls · Haworth v. Hubbard · Miller v. State Ex Rel. Tuthill · McKinney v. Town of Salem

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “beyond the power of agreement by the attorneys or parties.” App v. Class, 225 Ind. 387 , 75 N.E.2d 543 , 547 (1947) (citing Miller v. State ex rel. Tuthill, 202 Ind. 18 , 171 N.E. 381 , 384 (1930)). Put even more bluntly,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.