Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 Ind. 458 - Pry v. Pry

Pry v. Pry’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
3
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Bennett v. Knabe (In Re Knabe) (1981), J. M. Carey & Brother v. City of Casper (1950)

34 state decisions

10019471950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Henneger v. Lomas · State ex rel. MacKenzie v. Casteel · Stair v. Meissel · Medias v. City of Indianapolis · 75 Ind. App. 456 - Wiley v. Wiley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Omitted facts are to be considered as adverse to the pleader under the general presumption that a party will set forth all the facts favorable to his case. Penn-American etc., Co. v. Harshaw, etc., Co., 1910, 46 Ind. App. 645, 647 , 90 N. E. 1947 ; Cushman v. Cloverland Coal etc., Co., 1908; 170 Ind. 402, 408 , 84 N. E. 759 , 16 L. R. A., N. S., 1078, 127 Am. St. Rep. 391 ; Fink v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co., 1914, 181 Ind. 539, 543 , 105 N. E. 116 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The evidence of both the plaintiff and defendant disclosed that they were duly married. Whether either is entitled to have the marriage annuled is a matter that may be adjudicated in the main action. It is not before the trial court in this merely ancillary proceeding and hence is not before us in this appeal.” Pry v. Pry (1947), 225 Ind. 458 , 75 N. E. 2d 909 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““[T]he matter of granting temporary support and attorney fees to a wife in a divorce action is an interlocutory proceeding, ancillary to the main action designed to assure to the wife and children a proper support only during the pendency of the divorce action, and ... to insure to the wife an efficient preparation of her case and a fair and impartial trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.