Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 Ky. 725 - Corn v. Roach

Corn v. Roach’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 1954
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 1954

16 state decisions

601928193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Prather v. Watson's · Thurmond v. Thurmond · Roy v. West · Anderson v. Simpson · Laing v. Barbour

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A court, in construing a will, is not confined to a mere definition of particular words employed, but is required to take a comprehensive survey of the entire will. The apparent objects operating to influence the testator’s mind should be considered and the words used in the will given that reasonable construction best calculated to carry out the wishes of the testator as reflected by his will. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.