Parker v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1988
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on West v. Ray · McCann v. Todd · Ingersoll Corporation v. Rogers · Levy v. Levy · Succession of Alexander
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In any event, while we recognize that an action by one partner against another, whether engaged in a joint venture or formal partnership, McCann v. Todd, 203 La. 631 , 14 So.2d 469 , can only be brought after the dissolution of the partnership with respect to transactions or assets of the partnership, and then for the limited purpose of a final settlement, or to recover a balance determined to be due, Dromgoole v. Gardner's Widow & Heirs, 10 Mart., O.S., 433; Faurie v. Millaudon, 3 Mart., N.S., 476; Mead v. Curry, 8 Mart., N.S., 280; Levy v. Levy, 11 La. 577 ; Johnson v. Marshall, 4 Rob. 157 ; Hennegin v. Wilcoxon, 13 La.Ann. 576 ; Crottes v. Frigerio, 18 La. Ann. 283; Sewell v. Cooper, 21 La.Ann. 582 ; Stanton v. Buckner, 24 La.Ann. 391 ; Radovich v. Frigerio, 27 La.Ann. 68 ; West v. Ray, 210 La. 25 , 26 So.2d 22 [221], * * *."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.