Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 La. 495 - State v. Kelley

State v. Kelley’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 1973
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Varnado · State v. Guillot · State v. Toney · State v. Iseringhausen · State v. Gendusa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test to determine the sufficiency of an indictment or information is three-fold: "1. Is the indictment or information sufficient to inform the court what offense is being charged in order that the court might properly regulate the evidence sought to be introduced? "2. Does the indictment or information inform the accused of the nature and cause of the offense with which he is being charged? "3. Is the indictment sufficient on its face to support a plea of former jeopardy in event there is an attempt to try the defendant more than once for the same offense?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.