Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 Md. 94 - SMITH, EXEC. v. Waller

SMITH, EXEC. v. Waller’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2008

12 state decisions

4019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fulford v. Fulford · Fleishman v. Kremer · Jones, Admr. v. Harbaugh · Kerby v. Peters · Carey v. Reed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This Court has said and held repeatedly that, although an executor uñll be unhesitatingly removed for serious cause, yet, in the absence of fraud, bad faith, collusion or breach of trust and prejudice to the estate, letters will not be revoked until the executor in default has failed to comply voith an order to make good his default or omission. ” (Italics added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.